Female characters: Coursework Essay

For this coursework I am going to be explaining how writers in my chosen stories choke everywhere presented their fe priapic shells. I volition be investigating whether or non the womanishs mark their common emboss in the ordinal Century of organism very(prenominal)(prenominal) submissive and gullible. I impart excessively look at what riddle of focus they depoture that stump indoors everyday life or on a long term priming coat. To cave in a range in this probe I give concentrate on the contradicting boss of universe nonparasitic and assured as a wowork force non up to(p) in with how a normal 19th degree Celsius womanhood would expect to act. certain consequences of non acting as the stump argon proven to non of necessity ingest that pcticular woman worse off as we larn in the fiddling stories I am face at.Through stories I lead memorialise containing component parts based on the nineteenth one C wo custody one of the persuasions that was most obvious to me was that of the characters cosmos representative nineteenth cytosine woman at the inauguration of the go around radicals report and so secreteing disclose to be a lot unattackableer indeed we frontmost perceived.The frontmost character I am going to point which fits into this fancy is Dorothea from the in bunco horizontal surface The Unexpect by Kate Chopin. Chopin steers Dorothea to be a loving, doting wife, impatient towards her maintain arriving root. She is sh accept to be a correct fit for her sort proscribed. She is dependant on her husband and aflame and desperate for his arrival home. Chopin describes it as extort for Dorothea as she waits for her husband. This is very extreme vocabulary for the author to mapping to demonstrate that how Dorothea is feeling. Dorothea is com custodyted to having r for a tag on oneed the limit of her endurance this suggests wherefore the endorser feels she is very dependent on her passion as it frontms she can non cope with out(p) him.All of the preceding(prenominal) qualities I earn check outn in Dorothea fit into macrocosm characteristic of the nineteenth ascorbic acid. Although this is how we first see this of her she turns out to be the antonym of this emboss upon arrival of her husband. Dorothea is perceived as cosmos main(a), powerful and confident as she realises her husband is non what he utilize to be before he became ill. promptly, Dorothea has to make the decision of whether she still needs to be with her be kip blued. She packs to take leave him un evaluately and turns out to non be at whole manage her pigeonhole describes her. At the very end of the poor yarn Dorothea saysNever Not for totally his thousands Never, never Not for millionsThis shows she wants oft in her life past be at her husbands bedside while he wastes away. Dorothea wants someone she can truly love and look at feelings for. It shows she is going to be independent rather and then bid her stereotype. She is not shallow and staying with him and for his money. Chopins use of repetition in the above summon shows that she wants the reader to see how needy Dorothea is for a fulfilled life and not staying with her lamb when he is as frail as he is and comp permitely for his possessions.An separate neat layer which fits into the idea of fitting the stereotype then contradicting it is Tony Kytes the Arch-Deceiver by Thomas gay. thither be dickens characters, in my vista that fit this idea from this utterly tarradiddle wholeness Sallet and Hannah Jolliver.Firstly I presuppose Hannah Jolliver fits into this idea I present came up with of fitting the stereotype then contradicting it because of her role in the short degree Tony Kytes the Arch-Deceiver. Hannah is very flirtatious with Tony even though she knows that she is out of bounds as he is engaged to an early(a) woman. She is un-American to her suffer call forth . She toys with his emotions and is very previous or so their kind and is presented as being very independent exactly shows her stereotype when she is very easily pleased as Tony saysI oasist quite promised her, and I count on I can ticktack out of it, and ask you that forefront you speak of.With regards to the conjoin proposal to Milly. All this is being express when all three wowork force Tony is playing once more(prenominal)st each to her are in the police wagon with each former(a) notwithstanding unaware of it. She is sh cause to be very gullible at the start of the flooring when being told of how pretty she is by Tony, this is a feature of the stereotype which we see in all the characters work forcetioned in this variance of my coursework. Hannah is nigh won everyplace nevertheless by Tonys c trauma merely then something goes rail at. The wagon crashes payable to Hannah being left by herself at the reins. Tonys secret is out, all three wo men recuperat e each some new(prenominal)(a) to be cabalistic in the carriage and Hannah smarts herself when she falls out.Hannah is regularise crosswise to be the complete adversary to her stereotype for now at the end of the short floor. Her get under ones skin arrives on the blastoff of the accident just as Tony saysIve asked Hannah to be mine, and she is willing, and weare going to attri excepte up the banns next-But was interrupted by Hannahs father as Hannah was hurtMy daughter is not willing, sirAnd so Tony tries to tho his and Hannahs future, failing miserably. This is where Hannah feels the need to intervene,I conduct spirit, and I do drivel himHannah is shown to be very a good deal the opponent of her stereotype as we saw Dorothea do when things turned out to be various towards the end of her short horizontal surface. Hannah is confident and strong in her decision of rejecting Tonys proposal. We see that Hannah is a little bit more of her stereotype then we perceive her to be following what has just happened in the account. We are made to think that this decision was only reached because of the fact that her father was there as Hannah looks back once she is leaving with her father did she really destine it? I think that she would perhaps say yes was Tony to ask her again at a later eon and show she isnt as disparate as she is draw up across to be at the end of the short story.lastly I feel congruity fits into this idea as when we first meet her bodacious represents to us as being very desperate for perplexity from Tony through questions nigh her appearanceAnd can you say Im not pretty Tony? Now look at meHardy backs up this quote with a statement from Unity which shows that she is quite weak because she has to ask the question and answer it to show Tony the answer she is looking at for.Prettier than she?This further proves how needy Unity is for Tonys wise words and how gullible she is towards them. In my opinion Tony should not be ap othegm such things to someone when he is alleged(a) to be engaged to Milly Richards. This makes me thinks that he is able to realise that whoever he promises things will think him because that is what women were expected to be equivalent in the nineteenth century.As this question is put past Tony, Milly is in fact seen beforehand while Unity is in Tonys carriage. To prove how a lot more of the classifiable stereotype Unity is Tony asks her to lie down in the back part of the wagon to hide from his future wife and Unity agrees. This is further proof that she is very some(prenominal)(prenominal) like her stereotype.Now is where the countenance part of my idea comes with regards to Unity. Towards the end of this short story Unity starts to affirm up for herself. Tony asks for her hand in marriage AFTER he has already asked for Hannahs.Take her leavings? Not I Id scorn itAnd she walks away. This is the antagonist of what Unitys stereotype is. She is shown to be strong and con fident in the decision. Hardy shows Unity to stand up for her sex and not shame herself as being second excerpt, which in turn, leaves it down to Milly as the closing choice for TonyA second idea cost of exploration from schooling the range of short stories I was given over is that of the characters totally fitting their stereotype of a nineteenth century women. The main character I feel fits into this idea is Sophy out of the story The Sons proscribe by Thomas Hardy.Like the stereotype Sophy is weak and is described as a poor thing within the initiation of this short story. We also see just how weak Sophy is through her kin with her countersign, Randolph. Her boy is her biggest critic. We see this where he corrects Sophys grammarHas, sound m separate not haveThis is covering that Randolph is using his education to take receipts of his mother disadvantages. Randolph is alship canal correcting his mother and is mortified of her as she is not as head educated as she sh ould be this is however, due to her background.Randolph is very impolite to Sophy even though she is his motherSurely you know that by this time.He is the claw in this relationship but seemed to dominate Sophy showing how very much more like her stereotype she is, oddly when she does nothing astir(predicate) it. She realises her role in Randolphs life and all men she is considered to be beneath them and not worth their company. Randolph will not associate with those who are of a lower class then him, this includes Sophy. Hardy perceives Sophy as a fragile character by not let her stand up for herself.When Sophy tells Mr Twycott she will not be working for him anymore so she can marry surface-to-air missile, her reply to Mr Twycott when he asks if she wants to marry Sam isNot much but it would be a home for me.This shows she does not really up restrict who she ends up with as long as she has a roof over her head.Another profitable way that Hardy presents Sophy as being her typ ical stereotype is when she takes drastic consummation by marrying Mr Twycott kinda of her beloved Sam after a fight with Sam. She marries Mr Twycott more for respect then love which almost amounted to veneration. Mr Twycott knows he is marrying beneath him and will lose all the respect he has gained as said in the record part of the storyMr Twycott knew perfectly rise that he had committed social self-annihilation by this step.He moves to capital of the United Kingdom because of the fact he feels Sophy is beneath him. Sophy could have refuses Mr Twycotts marriage proposal but has no power or cartel in herself to do this as she is stimulate of the consequences if she does not do as she is told by the males in her life. Hardy puts Sophy across as being the perfect stereotype for typical nineteenth century through this work domination by males.The second character that I feel fits into this stereotype for being totally stereotype is Milly Richards again from the short story To ny Kytes the Arch-Deceiver by Thomas Hardy. Milly is seen to be the perfect stereotype for the nineteenth century woman. She has the husband ready for her and is very accustomed to him and is presented as being very reign by him and his needs. She is submissive to Tony and gullible to what he says. Her behaviour around him is very much like what women in the nineteenth century were expected to be like and did what was expected of them.As the short story develops we see that Milly is of a very nave spirit as she is asked to hide from one of the other women in the story for the sake of care the peace surrounded by that exceptional woman and Tony. Fitting the stereotype Milly agrees to do as she has been told by Tony,I dont mind, to oblige you, TonyMilly does not seem to mind, in my opinion, that Tony seems ashamed to be seen with her. Milly didnt care much about doing it and crouches down in the wagon unaware that Unity is also hidden amongst the wagon at the other end.Further i nto the story Milly realises that Unity is in the wagon and creeps up close to her. And even though Tony was in the wrong of having three women aboard his wagon Milly is very defensive of himMind what you are axiomThis proves she is even more like her stereotype due to her protecting the male and not sentiment he could do anything to harm her and thinking he is perfect. She is extremely overprotective of Tony and does not think that he would do such things to her resulting in her being disloyal to her own sex for not believe what Unity is saying to her.Toward the end of the story Milly is found amongst the wagon by the other two women. Tony chooses the other two women over Milly and so chooses Milly last to wed him. This is because he knows she is the typical stereotypical woman for the nineteenth century otherwise he would not have wasted his breath. Milly being the perfect stereotype saysIf you like, Tony. You didnt really mean what you said to them?And with a quick No from To ny things were settled and Milly believed what he had told her. Tony is actually thus disappointed he is left with his final choice as it is not seen as a challenge to win over Milly because she is the typical stereotype.For my third and final idea in this piece of coursework I will comment on contradicting stereotypes. The stereotypes that I have chosen that are perfect for this family are out of the short stories Births. Mrs modest, of a son and The Womans move.Firstly I will mention the character of The female child in the story The Womans arise. The basis of the story is a ruddiness that the daughter has and is very important to her. This rose is not mentioned very much at all in the opening of the short story but closer to the end it is see the light that it is important.At the start of this story the missy is the only woman in the colony and so has her choice of men, then the teller comes on.I feel that the lady friend is contradicting of her stereotype for the ty pical nineteenth century woman due to the impact she has on men in the story. Instead of being reliant on men and thinking about men all the time she is more elicit in the only other woman in this story and she has much more influence on the men in this short story then they will ever have on her. The men in this story adore the female childfriend like a pouffe as there was no other women to worship and all the men are trying to win her over and stand out so she will choose them.The girl had power she was the centre of management and stood out, what women in the nineteenth century were not expected to do. Schreiner presents the girl as being very much what women would loved to have been like and had the power to choose their choice of men rather then having to do the running themselves.At the end of the short story the girl goes up to the fibber in a bid to compose her friend although she has received mixed messages of whether or not to speak to her or not. The girl gave her one of the things that was most precious to her the rose.The girl is not the stereotype of what a typical nineteenth century woman should be. She grueling more on her relationship with the fibber then she did worrying about what typical women did back in those days get a husband and producing children for the male in their life. The girl wanted more for herself then that and did not depend on males but influenced them. In this short story it was more of a role atavism.I am also going to mention the only other woman that is in the short story The Womans Rose. She is known as The bank clerk. The rose in this short story is solid away put across to be very important to the storyteller in the opening paragraph which endsbut no one has my rose.To show its importance to her. The story then goes on to explain why it is of such treasure to the narrator. When the narrator came into the small village of which the girl utilize to be the only one attention was made of the narrator took this away from her. She started t be the centre of attention towards men and they worshipped her sooner. She influenced men. This was not necessarily because she was prettier then the girl but because she was something new for the men in the village to concentrate on. This is something that she is not aware of but has the fear that it is because she is new and not because they are truly interested in her. She is fresh meat. This made her feelings towards men feelings of hatred and regret for going to the village.The narrator liked the power she received from glide slope to the village but did not have a clue what to do with it and thinks she is hate by the one thing she does not want to be hated by in the story the girl. She wants a friendship with the girl but does not know how to go about it as she thinks she is hated and has plenty men to keep her occupied if not distracted from thinking about it. The narrator never looked at the girl and never had any fellowship with the gir l as she believed this was the better way to be if she was hated.Schreiner makes the narrator defend the girl if she is being spoke of amongst the village to show that she does care about what is said and does want to be her friend. For doing this it pays off towards the end of the short story when the white rose is obtained as an act of friendship by the girl.The narrator is shown to be the complete reversion of her stereotype in this short story and not at all like she is expected to be. She is shown to have other worries than that of the typical worries for women in that time normally.For the other two characters I will comment on in this idea I turn my attention towards a short story named Births. Mrs pocket-size, of a son. The two characters that I am going to mention are Mrs Progit and Mrs Bigby.Firstly I will let out about how I think Mrs Bigby is contradicting towards her stereotype. full the beginning of the story Mrs Bigby is said to be able to storm a town, single-ha ndedly and that she could terrify the stoutest heart. Mrs Bigby is almost emphatically not at all like her stereotype. She is a remarkable woman. Her son-in-law is panicky of her as she is a scary woman. former(a) women in her time were not forward enough to be scary as such and did not have the reliance to scare males in their lives. This is the complete diametric of what we saw in The Sons Veto and the character of Sophy. She was not so much scared of her son but the roles were in the correct places for the nineteenth century. The reverse is what we see in the relationship between Mrs Bigby and her son-in-law.Most women in the nineteenth century dont have much of an education and Mrs Bigby boasts of this knowledge. She is the total opposite of what is expected of women in her time. She is the dominate one in the relationship between her and Mr spiritless. She wont let him see his own son and as a result of this Mr Meek is angry and frustrated he feels shoved aside. The male in this story feels left out in the cold. With emotions running wild Mr Meek thinks his son is being killed. Mr Meek shows the qualities of a nineteenth century woman instead of Mrs Meek as is expected as she is the woman in this short story. She is possibly the best example of the contradicting stereotype along with the next character I am going to talk about Mrs Progit.Mrs Progit is a character of copious figure which gets in the way a lot and an obstruction to other people. She completely contradicts her stereotype by being very confident in her behaviour and brings desolation and devastation into other people lives in the short story. She has taken over the house. Mrs Progit wont let Mr Meek see his son as well as Mrs Bigby. She wants to keep the child to herself and raised a storm about the subject.She has power and alienates Maria Janes affections towards Mr Meek with the power she has. She pushes Mr Meek about which is not what her stereotype would do. She is supposed to be serenity and dominated by males but instead there has been a role reversal regarding Mrs Progit. She is completely confident in her own nature and does not let herself get pushed around by the male but instead gives them a taste of their own medicine. This is what women in the nineteenth century did not have the power and confidence to do because they were afraid of the consequences.In conclusion of this piece of coursework I feel I have successfully explored how distinct writers have presented female characters in their short stories to show different ways in which women could act in the nineteenth century and the results how they act towards other characters in the stories. I read a range of different stories that I mat would get all the different views across and only included those stories that I pattern had solid evidence of different ways in which women felt they had to be like or what they wanted to be like. I think I have investigated how the writers farm their charact ers and form the readers opinions of those particular characters using structure and clever report techniques.